Free divided attention drill — instant play, no signup, no download
Sort & Count asks you to sort items into categories and keep a running count at the same time. Neither task is hard; combining them is, because the counting has to survive being interrupted by every sorting decision.
Items appear one at a time.
Sort each into the correct category.
Maintain a running count as you go.
Report the count when prompted.
Both sorting accuracy and count accuracy are scored.
Maintaining a running total while performing a competing task. Counting is unusually fragile under interruption — a single distraction resets it for most people.
Count on your fingers or with a physical tap. An external count survives interruption far better than a mental one.
Count in a rhythm so each increment has a fixed place.
Do not verbalise the categories. Verbalising competes with the count for the same rehearsal channel.
If you lose the count, estimate rather than abandon. A close count scores better than none.
Counting relies on verbal rehearsal, and every sorting decision interrupts that rehearsal. Physical counting bypasses the conflict.
Yes, and it is the single most effective strategy here.
Both are scored. The count is what most people lose, so it is worth protecting.
No. Speed Sorting is sorting alone against the clock. This adds the running count, which is the whole difficulty.